Captain Marvel Review (No Spoilers)

After weeks of vigorously defending the casting of Academy Award-winning actress, Brie Larson, and her alleged comments about “hating white men,” I finally got to actually see the movie. Before I go any further in my review, let me say right off the bat – Brie Larson NEVER said she didn’t want white men to review her movie. If you continue arguing she did, that’s your prerogative but you would be rightfully deemed “ignorant.” Wanting more diversity from women and people of color in her press tour is not tantamount to “not wanting white people to see her movie.” And then, Larson, unnecessarily if I may, clarified her comments by stating “What I’m looking for is to bring more seats up to the table. No one is getting their chair taken away. There’s not less seats at the table, there’s just more seats at the table.” It’s disturbing that a huge chunk of the online film fan community is unable to look at the facts and continue displaying ignorance by pushing their erroneous, sexist agendas.

Positives – When the movie had Carol interacting with her best friend, Maria, and Nick Fury, it was a lot more enjoyable because we actually got to see some personality from Danvers. Throughout the movie, Larson’s Danvers is extremely stoic but having scenes with other actors like Sam Jackson or Lashana Lynch made her more likable. The supporting actors all do a solid job for the material they were given but Ben Mendelsohn’s Talos stole the movie for me. He was much more than your average MCU baddie and at the end of the day, I really dug what they did with his arc. The story was great and this movie is also a great connective tissue with the rest of the MCU, while also giving a tease to the future of Captain Marvel character. The humor also worked a lot more for me than it has in some of the latest MCU flicks and there was just an appropriate amount of it. The visual effects were solid, for the most part, and the action sequences were super fun to watch, especially the train sequence and beginning fight with the Skrulls.

Negatives – The biggest problem with the movie is with the characterization, or lack thereof, of the titular character – Carol Danvers (Captain Marvel). Despite being an origin story, we don’t really learn much about her or her vulnerabilities. All we get are glimpses to her past and other characters telling us about Carol rather than us actually learning about her. It also doesn’t help that Captain Marvel is so freaking powerful, which reduced the stakes and made the tension less palpable. Even Superman, considered the most powerful superhero, faced challenges in movies like Man of Steel and Batman v Superman, but the filmmakers probably thought that to show a strong female character, they have to make her so vastly overpowered. As mentioned before, Brie Larson is an Academy Award-winning actress but there were so many moments where her delivery was wooden. That being said, it’s just possible that the direction wasn’t that good and seeing her in Endgame will get us onboard with the character. We also learn how Fury loses one of his eyes in the movie and what was supposed to be a serious moment is played for laughs. It also makes me question Fury’s line in Captain America: The Winter Soldier “Last time I trusted someone, I lost an eye.” Another aspect of the movie they could have improved on is the style. What I mean by that is the last couple of MCU movies (sans Ant-man and the Wasp) all had distinct styles and brought something unique. This movie felt like a very generic sci-fi movie with a template we’ve seen before.

Rating – Even though Captain Marvel is definitely a fun movie to watch and undeniably an important movie for representation, it still felt like a generic MCU movie (think the likes of Guardians 2 or Ant-man 2) that had a bland titular character. Here’s hoping she receives the same treatment in Endgame that Dr. Strange received in Infinity War, which made him an awesome character. 3.3/5

Screen Shot 2019-03-08 at 5.46.14 PM

Glass Review (No Spoilers)

M Night Shyamalan, the director of both acclaimed films like Unbreakable, The Sixth Sense, Split and reviled films like Avatar: The Last Airbender, The Happening, After Earth, has had an interesting career to say the least. There was a time when M Night was called “the next Spielberg” but then something happened (excess pride?) and he started cranking out poorly-received films consecutively, to the point where studios did not even use his name to market films, ie ‘The Visit.’ However, he seemed to kind of find his groove again by directing 2 good movies in a row – the aforementioned ‘The Visit’ and ‘Split,’ where he brilliantly tied the events of ‘Split’ to the larger superheroic-‘Unbreakable’ world. Thus, here we are. Being a Shyamalan movie, we expect a twist to completely change our perception of the movie (ie Sixth Sense), which is why I worked extra hard to avoid giving any hints of the twist. But just a random question, is it even a spoiler to say “there is a twist in a M Night Shyamalan movie?”

Positives – James Mcavoy is absolutely wonderful in this movie and it’s a shame his performance will likely be forgotten by the Academy voters. Playing so many different characters effortlessly requires a world-class actor and Mcavoy might just have given his best performance to date. Samuel L Jackson returns as the villainous Elijah Price, aka Mr. Glass, and he definitely brings his A-game to the “limited” role he has. Bruce Willis, whose recent performances have been less than stellar, is actually pretty good in the few scenes that he does have. M Night relies a lot more on Willis’ physique as Dunn rather than giving him a lot of dialogue to work with. Barring a couple of poor CGI moments, the fight sequences between Dunn and The Beast were pretty cool to watch and definitely packed a super-strong punch. Despite a weak first half, the second half is actually pretty exciting because we see Glass actually be a mastermind and use his incredible wits. As was the case with Unbreakable and Split, Shyamalan uses colors brilliantly and consistently for the 3 main characters – Dunn’s being green, Kevin’s being yellow and Elijah’s being purple. It’s a good way to distinguish the characters.

Negatives – The movie has serious pacing issues and you definitely feel the 2 hr+ runtime. One of my biggest issue, albeit a nitpick, is the security measures or lack thereof in the the psychiatric hospital. It seems as if a patient can wander around the hospital and tamper with the cameras, equipment etc. without being noticed. The movie’s called Glass when the more appropriate title should be “Split 2: Featuring Unbreakable characters.” Even though Mcavoy is captivating to watch, the movie should have featured more of Dunn and Glass, with the latter literally being the titular character. Also, what was the point of having Dr. Staple (somehow) convince the characters that they are suffering from the delusion of possessing superpowers? More importantly, that should not have add any effect on them because they clearly know they have these abilities. Dunn was the “Overseer” for years and his whole arc in Unbreakable was realizing he has these gifts. So what was the point of retreading over the same story again. The dialogue is pretty clunky at times and Shyamalan resorts to having the characters engage in a lot of exposition and explanation even though it’s largely unnecessary. Without going into any more detail, the ending will leave people divided. For some, like it did for me, the ending worked for the most part. But this is one of those movies I totally understand why others may dislike the ending.

Despite some terrific performances, especially from Mcavoy, and a cool, realistic take on super-powered individuals duking it out, Glass left me a little disappointed. It has narrative issues, logical inconsistencies and a tendency to over rely on exposition. For fans of Unbreakable and Split (like myself), Glass is somewhat of a satisfying conclusion of the trilogy but definitely sub-par compared to its predecessors.

Rating – 2.8/5