Tag: James Mcavoy

IT Chapter Two Review (No Spoilers)

Just like Harley Quinn in the ‘Birds of Prey‘ teaser, we should all be so “f*cking over clowns” too but we need them, don’t we? With Pennywise and the Joker, psychotic clowns are going to be giving the box office a much-needed boost.

After defeating IT, the ‘Losers’ all go their separate ways, with most of them leaving Derry and starting their own lives. 27 years later, however, IT returns which necessitates the return of the gang too. As a massive fan of the first IT and the actual 1000+ sprawling novel, I was excited about the sequel. The studio definitely assembled a star-studded cast (with the likes of James Mcavoy, Jessica Chastain, Bill Hader, etc.) and the predecessor was delightfully entertaining.

Positives

In terms of performances, the actors all deliver. Mcavoy (Bill) and Chastain (Beverly)  bring their usual A-game, carrying a lot of the film’s emotionally-charged sequences. For Bill, it’s a ‘storyline’ with a random kid who he encounters a couple of times that truly allows the actor to flex his acting muscles. You absolutely buy his frustration and anger and Mcavoy truly excels there. The other adult Losers’ actors – James Ransone (a still-hypochondriacal Eddie), Jay Ryan (a more muscular Ben), Isaiah Mustafa (Mike), and Andy Bean (Stanely) are all great as well and are definitely prime for more roles in the future. But, I really have to echo what most people are saying “Bill Hader steals the movie.” Not only is he easily the funniest character (Richie) in the film, but also one of the most sympathetic. Even though he’s still as foul-mouthed as ever, we learn that his tendency to be puerile is more of a facade he wears to not reveal his true feelings. I can’t really delve more into that because of spoilers…

Richie and Eddie’s back-and-forth is particularly engaging and absolutely fun to watch. The cast has excellent chemistry and when they are allowed to interact with each other, you really feel a sense of camaraderie. My favorite scene in the movie is the Chinese restaurant scene where the adults reunite for the first time and try to remember their past. Of course, Pennywise is up to his usual devilish antics and ruins the reunion but, that scene perfectly captures the chemistry. Their personalities and charming back-and-forth are played extremely well and it’s clear that the cast had a lot of fun too.

Screen Shot 2019-09-07 at 4.03.32 PM.png

Courtesy of Warner Bros & New Line Cinema

Albeit a poor decision to show the titular character in broad daylight and not given enough screentime, Bill Skarsgård’s Pennywise is still pretty terrifying. There are 2 wonderful Pennywise-related additions in the movie (not in the book) that were f*kn awesome – a scene with a young girl underneath the bleachers at a baseball game and the ‘Hall of Mirrors.’ Not only is the ‘Hall of Mirrors’ scene extremely thrilling, but also effective because Bill sees Georgie in the aforementioned kid and doesn’t want the same fate to befall him.

source.gif

The cinematography, the production and the hybrid of CGI/practical effects are all pretty solid. But by far, the most surprising aspect of the film is its abundance of humor (sometimes to a fault). IT Chapter Two is dam funny, which is probably not what most viewers expected. There is also a pretty meta-throughline about Bill’s character (who is a writer) sucking at writing a proper ending, which is a common complaint of Stephen King’s book endings.

Negatives

Even though the first IT had a great balance of humor and scares, the sequel goes a little overboard with the humor, which often ends up undercutting the emotional sequences. In addition, we don’t learn much about adults (aside from the obligatory scenes in the beginning). It would’ve been great to actually spend more time with them before they are thrust to this world again. The child actors also return and even though they were great in the first one, their additions take away screentime from their adult counterparts.

Also, the whole point of the second part of the IT story is that the adults reunite to take down IT. Unfortunately, the entire second act is the Losers being separated and finding ‘totems’ or relics from their childhood for a sacrifice, which would have been okay if the ritual ended up being (at least a little) effective. It doesn’t, so you’re left with almost an hour of the movie being pointless. Think Finn and Rose’s storyline in Star Wars: The Last Jedi… This is also where the movie drags a little and could have truncated a portion of the runtime (which is almost as long as Avengers: Endgame). Each character (sans characters like an adult Mike) is allocated 5-10 minutes and some of their nostalgic moments just aren’t that interesting.

03a035cd-fe2f-494a-829a-7570f7bb6bdb-screen-shot-2019-08-30-at-114640-am.png

Courtesy of Warner Bros & New Line Cinema

Speaking of, Mike is the only loser that stayed back after defeating IT and vividly remembers IT and the adventures they had. However, he once again gets the short end of the stick, in terms of character development, and we don’t learn much about him. He exists as an exposition-dumping machine and doesn’t have much of a personality. Returning characters like Henry Bowers, the switchblade-wielding bully, has absolutely no purpose being in the movie. He doesn’t affect the story much, if at all, and simply ends up taking precious screentime away from other characters.

The filmmakers also feel a need to shove a lot of material from the book and oftentimes, it feels as if not enough time is spent to let us marinate on what just transpired. I contend that this film could have benefitted from splitting into 2 movies, which would have given us more time to flesh out the pre-Derry adult Losers and explore the mythology behind Pennywise.

Finally, the big climactic moment ends up feeling extremely anti-climactic and I was left scratching my head “that’s how they defeat IT?”

Rating – Mild Recommendation

Albeit filled with strong performances and hilarious one-liners, IT Chapter Two is a bit of a disappointment. 2017 IT was so good that when compared to the original, the sequel was always going to be a bit of a let-down. Regardless, the movie has good scares and is an entertaining watch.

Screen Shot 2019-09-07 at 2.18.43 PM

Glass Review (No Spoilers)

M Night Shyamalan, the director of both acclaimed films like Unbreakable, The Sixth Sense, Split and reviled films like Avatar: The Last Airbender, The Happening, After Earth, has had an interesting career to say the least. There was a time when M Night was called “the next Spielberg” but then something happened (excess pride?) and he started cranking out poorly-received films consecutively, to the point where studios did not even use his name to market films, ie ‘The Visit.’ However, he seemed to kind of find his groove again by directing 2 good movies in a row – the aforementioned ‘The Visit’ and ‘Split,’ where he brilliantly tied the events of ‘Split’ to the larger superheroic-‘Unbreakable’ world. Thus, here we are. Being a Shyamalan movie, we expect a twist to completely change our perception of the movie (ie Sixth Sense), which is why I worked extra hard to avoid giving any hints of the twist. But just a random question, is it even a spoiler to say “there is a twist in a M Night Shyamalan movie?”

Positives – James Mcavoy is absolutely wonderful in this movie and it’s a shame his performance will likely be forgotten by the Academy voters. Playing so many different characters effortlessly requires a world-class actor and Mcavoy might just have given his best performance to date. Samuel L Jackson returns as the villainous Elijah Price, aka Mr. Glass, and he definitely brings his A-game to the “limited” role he has. Bruce Willis, whose recent performances have been less than stellar, is actually pretty good in the few scenes that he does have. M Night relies a lot more on Willis’ physique as Dunn rather than giving him a lot of dialogue to work with. Barring a couple of poor CGI moments, the fight sequences between Dunn and The Beast were pretty cool to watch and definitely packed a super-strong punch. Despite a weak first half, the second half is actually pretty exciting because we see Glass actually be a mastermind and use his incredible wits. As was the case with Unbreakable and Split, Shyamalan uses colors brilliantly and consistently for the 3 main characters – Dunn’s being green, Kevin’s being yellow and Elijah’s being purple. It’s a good way to distinguish the characters.

Negatives – The movie has serious pacing issues and you definitely feel the 2 hr+ runtime. One of my biggest issue, albeit a nitpick, is the security measures or lack thereof in the the psychiatric hospital. It seems as if a patient can wander around the hospital and tamper with the cameras, equipment etc. without being noticed. The movie’s called Glass when the more appropriate title should be “Split 2: Featuring Unbreakable characters.” Even though Mcavoy is captivating to watch, the movie should have featured more of Dunn and Glass, with the latter literally being the titular character. Also, what was the point of having Dr. Staple (somehow) convince the characters that they are suffering from the delusion of possessing superpowers? More importantly, that should not have add any effect on them because they clearly know they have these abilities. Dunn was the “Overseer” for years and his whole arc in Unbreakable was realizing he has these gifts. So what was the point of retreading over the same story again. The dialogue is pretty clunky at times and Shyamalan resorts to having the characters engage in a lot of exposition and explanation even though it’s largely unnecessary. Without going into any more detail, the ending will leave people divided. For some, like it did for me, the ending worked for the most part. But this is one of those movies I totally understand why others may dislike the ending.

Despite some terrific performances, especially from Mcavoy, and a cool, realistic take on super-powered individuals duking it out, Glass left me a little disappointed. It has narrative issues, logical inconsistencies and a tendency to over rely on exposition. For fans of Unbreakable and Split (like myself), Glass is somewhat of a satisfying conclusion of the trilogy but definitely sub-par compared to its predecessors.

Rating – 2.8/5